It had to be done a long time ago. Moreover, it is such articles, such a view on our project will help to attract investors. First of all, by studying the ICO, any more or less competent investor looks on the problem that the project solves. Does this project need a blockchain? Are there any operating analogues of the service? This is what we are now talking about — competitors. So…
Lancer Network vs non-blockchain freelance platform
Well, everything is simple here. The current freelance sites do not cope with their functions. It is easy to meet here both deception and incompetence. High commissions or expensive pay for working accounts distinguishes a few reliable sites. There is no trust at all! Simply put, all that is intended to eliminate the freelance site, on the contrary, is thriving. As a result, it turns out that the customer and the performer are equally afraid of each other.
These are exactly the problems that blockchain and Lancer Network solve. Fraud will be excluded from the platform — without the tokens, the user will not be able to create the task (it is obvious that scammers will not invest money for deception at this level). Subsequently, we plan to add smart contracts. So far, we will have small assignments for promotion, which are unlikely to interest the scammer — too small for win. Another significant plus of our platform is payment in the cryptocurrency. That is, the user receives not money, but an asset that becomes more expensive over time.
Separately note that Lancer Network is designed for other functions. First of all, promotion of ICO by the type of bounty campaigns. Our economic model involves paying not for the entire amount of work in thousands of retweets, but separately for each task. This is very different from the tasks of ordinary freelance platforms.
Perhaps, it is possible to say with confidence that Lancer Network is better than non-blockchain based solutions.
Lancer Network vs Coinlancer
This is a strong project. Successful sales, many exchanges, user-friendly interface — it would seem that with such an opponent we cannot compete. But… Coinlancer assumes 3% fees for each task placed by the customer and no fees for freelancer. Our economic model assumes only the payment for creating a task that will be fixed. In addition, Lancer Network will use ANY crypto currency, which is already traded on the market. This is much more convenient than using just one token.
Moreover, Lancer Network and Coinlancer have different interests at the moment. Coinlancer tries to cover the market as a whole, while our project focuses specifically on social networks. Obviously, over time we will expand our zone of influence, but clearly not now.
Lancer Network vs Sprut Social
Let’s not forget that Lancer Network is about social networks and promotion. What interesting projects are in this direction? Sprut Social is a social media promotion platform with enterprise and corporate solutions. This is an impressive service, which has been working for 8 years. However, the platform only optimizes the work in social networks. There is no promotion service in here. Sprut Social OPTIMIZES, NOT PROMOTES. It is here that Lancer Network enters.
Our platform looks more advantageous due to the fact that it involves users in the social media of the customer and allows you to earn in cryptocurrency. Of course, Sprut Social is now more known and popular, has more customers, but it’s only a matter of time. If we discard all the conventions, then our service looks interesting also due to the high popularity of the crypto currency. Hundreds of thousands of users track each new project — you need to spend a lot of money to make the non-blockchain based service also well known.
Even experts admit that Lancer Network looks promising. Of course, sales and further development are ahead, but at least the project has the right to exist. Time will tell.
Bitcointalk profile: redtrust
Comments
Post a Comment